
BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO
- Rating
- 3.5
- Downloads
- 100,000+
- Age
- Everyone
Additional Info
- App Name
- BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO
- Category
- Maps & Navigation
- Package Name
- com.crittermap.backcountrynavigator.license
- Developer
- CritterMap Software LLC
- Rating
- 3.5
- Version
- 8.0.5








Analysis by Appcrazy
I approached BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO as a practical outdoor navigation tool rather than a replacement for every map app on a phone. Its purpose is clear: it is built for people who want to use an Android device as a handheld GPS, especially when an internet connection may be unreliable. That focus gives it a useful place among hiking and backcountry tools, but it also means the app asks more from the user than a simple turn-by-turn navigation service.
The app comes from CritterMap Software LLC and sits in the Maps & Navigation category. It has been available since June 23, 2010, which gives it a long history compared with many newer outdoor mapping products. The current version is 8.0.5, and it runs on Android 5.0 or later. I would describe it as a specialist tool: rewarding when I prepare a route carefully, less appealing when I simply want to enter a destination and follow spoken directions.
What makes this outdoor GPS app different
The central attraction is offline topographic mapping. In everyday use, that matters most in places where mobile coverage is weak, inconsistent, or too expensive to rely on. A normal online map can look perfect before a trip and become much less useful once the signal disappears. With this app, the important work happens before leaving: I would select the map area, make sure the needed map material is available offline, and check the route while I still have a connection.
That preparation changes the experience. This is not the kind of app I would open for a spontaneous drive across town. It is better suited to a hike, a camping trip, a remote property visit, or a route where terrain matters more than traffic. Topographic information can help me understand slopes, ridgelines, valleys, trails, and the relationship between a planned route and the surrounding land. Those details are often more useful outdoors than the clean road-focused presentation of a standard navigation app.
The app is priced at $14.99, with additional in-app items ranging from $3.99 to $24.99 each. That makes the purchase decision more serious than downloading a free map application. I would not recommend paying for it merely to experiment with offline maps for one afternoon. Its value becomes easier to justify for someone who regularly hikes, hunts, explores rural areas, or needs a dedicated mapping workflow and is willing to learn it.
The store listing shows a 3.5 average from around seven thousand ratings, along with roughly two thousand four hundred written reviews and over one hundred thousand installs. Those figures suggest a real user base, but also a mixed experience rather than universal approval. I read that as a useful warning: the app’s specialist design will suit some people extremely well, while others may find the setup and interface more demanding than expected.
Trust starts with knowing what the app is for
For me, trust in a navigation app begins with a realistic understanding of its role. An offline map can be a strong backup, but it should not encourage careless planning. A phone can lose power, suffer from weather, become difficult to read in bright sunlight, or provide an inaccurate position in challenging terrain. I would still carry a physical map, a charged power bank, and a sensible plan for the area.
Catch Up on the Latest Stories

Microsoft Teams on Mobile Keeps Work Moving, If You Keep It Tidy

Groupon Turns Local Discounts Into a Marketplace, With a Catch

App of the Week: Yandex Go Makes City Errands Easier

Make Xiaomi Weather Work Harder with Smarter Settings and Daily Routines

Boomplay Turns Music Streaming Into a Daily Discovery Habit

Google Docs on Mobile Keeps the Page in Focus, Until Formatting Gets in the Way
That is not a criticism unique to this product. It is especially relevant here because the app’s main promise makes offline access feel central. I would test the complete route before departure instead of assuming that a map visible at home will remain available in the field. I would also avoid treating a drawn line as proof that a trail is open, safe, or legally accessible. The app can support decisions, but it cannot replace local knowledge or judgment.
The Everyone content rating makes the app broadly suitable from an age-classification perspective. That does not mean every outdoor situation is suitable for every user. A child using it on a family walk still needs supervision, and a first-time hiker should not depend on a screen alone. The rating tells me about content suitability, not about the difficulty of navigation or the risks of remote travel.
Controls I would check before taking it outdoors
My first practical step would be to inspect the app’s visible settings and Android permission controls before using it on a trip. I want to know when location access is requested, whether the system offers a choice between approximate and precise location, and whether access can be limited while the app is not in use. Those are Android-level choices, but they are important because a navigation app cannot provide a position without some form of location access.
I would also review notification behavior, battery-related permissions, and any account or purchase screens that appear during setup. Outdoor navigation can be interrupted by aggressive battery saving, while unrestricted background activity can affect battery life. The right choice depends on the trip: a short walk may not need continuous tracking, while following a route in unfamiliar terrain may make regular location updates more useful.
Because the app includes paid items, I would pay attention to exactly what is being offered before confirming a purchase. The listed in-app range is wide enough that I would not tap through a map or content prompt without reading the price and description. I would use the platform’s purchase authentication and keep an eye on the account associated with the transaction. That is a simple habit, but it prevents an outdoor tool from becoming an unpleasant billing surprise.
I would make the same check after an update. Version 8.0.5 is the current version identified for this review, and updates can change layouts, prompts, or the location of settings. Before relying on the app for an important trip, I would open it, confirm that my saved areas and routes are still accessible, and verify that the map display behaves as expected. A few minutes of checking at home is much better than discovering a change at a trailhead.
Where data sensitivity matters most
Location is the obvious sensitive point. A route history can reveal where I live, where I work, which trailheads I visit, or when I tend to travel. Even a single saved waypoint may identify a private campsite, a hunting area, or a place on someone’s property. I would therefore treat saved tracks and marked locations as personal information, not as harmless notes.
My approach would be to avoid recording more than I need. If I only need an offline reference map, I would not start continuous tracking simply because the option is available. If I am recording a route for later use, I would review it afterward and remove old tracks that no longer serve a purpose. I would also avoid sharing screenshots that expose a home address or a precise private location.
Account controls deserve similar attention. If the app asks me to sign in, I would use an account I can manage and would check whether there is a clear way to change credentials, sign out, or remove access later. I would not create an account with a password reused from email or banking. If a feature works without an account, I would consider whether signing in adds enough value to justify another place where my information is stored.
Purchases create another moment where I want clear user choice. The app’s paid price and optional item range mean I would distinguish carefully between the initial purchase and any extra map-related content. I would keep purchase confirmations enabled and review the platform’s subscription or payment settings if an offer seemed unclear. I would also avoid approving a purchase while distracted at a trailhead, where poor signal and hurry can make screens easy to misread.
I cannot make a responsible privacy judgment from the app’s category or its navigation purpose alone. Instead, I would read the current privacy information shown in the store and inside the app, then compare it with the permissions Android displays. If the explanation is difficult to follow, that would affect my comfort level. Clear choices matter more to me than broad promises.
A realistic workflow for a weekend hike
Imagine I am planning a Saturday hike in a rural park. On Friday evening, I would open the app while connected to Wi-Fi, identify the entire walking area rather than only the trailhead, and prepare the map material needed for the route. I would zoom out far enough to understand nearby roads and escape options, then zoom in to inspect turns, crossings, and terrain details.
Next, I would mark the start point, destination, and any important alternatives. I would not rely on a single line through the landscape. I would note a possible turnaround point, a nearby access road, and a route back toward the trailhead. This is one of the app’s more valuable uses: it encourages me to think spatially instead of following a blue line without understanding the surroundings.
Before leaving, I would switch off mobile data temporarily or use airplane mode with location re-enabled, then test the map. If the area and route remain usable, I have more confidence that the offline preparation worked. I would repeat the test after downloading or saving anything important, because seeing a map once while online is not the same as confirming offline availability.
At the trailhead, I would keep the phone in a protective case, lower screen brightness when practical, and use the app in short checks rather than staring at it continuously. Every check would answer a specific question: Am I near the planned junction? Is the terrain changing? Which direction leads back to the access road? This approach saves battery and reduces the risk of walking while distracted.
After returning, I would review the recorded route only if I had intentionally enabled tracking. I would correct my notes while the experience was fresh, then delete anything I did not need to keep. That final cleanup is easy to overlook, but it gives me better control over location history and keeps future map work less cluttered.
Advanced habits that improve the experience
One useful habit is preparing a wider safety area than the route itself. A narrow offline download may be enough for a planned line but useless if I need to detour around fallen trees, a closed section, or a wrong turn. I would include nearby roads, trail junctions, and possible exits. The trade-off is storage space and preparation time, so I would choose a sensible buffer instead of saving an entire region without a reason.
A second is separating navigation layers in my own thinking. I would use the topographic map to understand terrain and orientation, then verify practical details such as access, closures, weather, and local rules through appropriate current sources before leaving. A map can show where a path appears to be; it does not automatically tell me whether that path is maintained or permitted.
A third is creating a backup that does not depend on the same device. I would write down the trailhead, destination, and emergency contact details, and carry a paper map when the route is remote. If the phone battery fails, the screen breaks, or the app behaves unexpectedly after an update, I still have a way to explain where I am and how I planned to return.
I would also test the screen and controls with the gloves, case, and brightness settings I expect to use outdoors. An interface that feels comfortable indoors can be awkward in cold weather or direct sunlight. This is a small but important trade-off: the app may provide detailed information, yet the amount of detail is only useful if I can read and operate it safely.
How it compares with familiar alternatives
Compared with a conventional road-navigation app, this product is more appropriate when the route is not primarily about driving directions. A car-focused app is usually faster for traffic, addresses, businesses, and spoken guidance. I would choose that kind of service for a city trip or a long highway journey. I would choose this one when the shape of the land, offline preparation, and outdoor route planning matter more.
Compared with a paper map, the app is easier to zoom, search, and carry across several planned areas. It can put a moving position marker on the map, which is convenient when I need to check my orientation. Paper still wins for battery independence, immediate readability when a phone fails, and simple long-term reliability. For serious trips, I see the two as partners rather than rivals.
Compared with a free map app, the purchase price may be difficult to justify for occasional users. Free tools can be perfectly adequate for casual walks, especially when a user already knows the area. The stronger case for this app is repeated outdoor use and a willingness to prepare maps and routes in advance. If I only want a quick route to a nearby park, I would probably choose the simpler option.
The app also demands more personal responsibility than automatic navigation. It will not turn route planning into a hands-off activity. That is a strength for experienced users who want control, but a weakness for someone expecting the app to make every decision. I would skip it if I dislike checking map coverage, managing offline material, or learning a more specialized interface.
Who should use it, and who should pass
I think it is a good match for hikers, campers, rural travelers, outdoor photographers, property owners, and anyone who regularly moves beyond dependable cellular coverage. It is particularly useful for people who enjoy planning routes with terrain in mind and who understand that navigation is a process of checking position, landscape, and alternatives.
I would be more cautious recommending it to a beginner planning a demanding solo trip. The app can support that person, but it should not be the only safety system. A beginner may be better served by a guided route, a local outdoor group, or a simpler navigation tool combined with a paper map and clear trip plan.
I would also pass if my main need were urban navigation, public transit, live traffic, or business search. Paying for a specialist outdoor app would add complexity without solving those problems better. The same applies if I rarely leave areas with reliable coverage and have no interest in offline planning.
My cautious verdict
My opinion is positive but conditional. BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO has a clear identity, a long-running presence, and a practical reason to exist: it gives Android users a more deliberate way to prepare for outdoor navigation with offline topographic maps. I value that it encourages route awareness rather than reducing every journey to automatic instructions.
The cost, optional paid items, preparation demands, and need to manage location-related choices make it unsuitable as a casual download for everyone. I would inspect permissions, account prompts, purchase screens, and privacy information before committing to regular use. I would also test offline behavior and keep an independent backup before trusting it on a remote route.
For my own use, the deciding question would be frequency. If I were heading outdoors several times a season and wanted a dedicated planning tool, I could see the $14.99 purchase making sense. If I needed occasional directions or a city map, I would choose a simpler alternative. This is best treated as a prepared outdoor navigation instrument, not a magic safety net.
That distinction is what makes the app easier to trust. I know what I am asking it to do, I can make deliberate choices about location and purchases, and I can keep sensitive route information under control. Used with that level of care, it can be a valuable companion for the right kind of trip. Used without preparation, it may feel more complicated than the problem I originally wanted to solve.
Pros
- Highly accurate GPS tracking.
- Works offline with preloaded maps.
- Detailed topographic maps available.
- Customizable waypoints and markers.
- Supports GPX and KML file formats.
Cons
- Can drain battery quickly.
- Interface is slightly outdated.
- Paid app with no free version.
- Limited customer support available.
- Steep learning curve for beginners.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO and who is it designed for?
BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO is a premium GPS app designed for outdoor enthusiasts such as hikers, backpackers, hunters, and off-road explorers. It provides detailed topographic maps and navigation features to help users plan and track their outdoor adventures, even in areas without cell coverage. This app is ideal for anyone needing reliable offline navigation tools.
Can I use BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO without an internet connection?
Yes, one of the key features of BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO is its ability to function offline. Users can download maps ahead of time and access them without an internet connection while out in the field. This makes it especially useful for exploring remote areas where cellular service is unreliable or unavailable.
What types of maps are available on BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO?
BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO offers a variety of maps, including topographic maps, aerial imagery, road maps, and marine navigation charts. Users can choose from multiple map sources depending on their needs, ensuring they have the most suitable map for their outdoor activities. The app supports downloading maps for offline use, providing flexibility and preparedness for any adventure.
How user-friendly is the BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO app for beginners?
BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO is designed with both novice and experienced users in mind. While it offers advanced features for seasoned navigators, its interface is intuitive enough for beginners. The app includes tutorials and user guides to help new users get accustomed to its functionalities, making it accessible to anyone interested in outdoor navigation.
Is there a cost associated with using BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO?
Yes, BackCountry Navigator GPS PRO is a paid app, reflecting its comprehensive features and offline capabilities. While there is an initial purchase cost, this investment grants users access to extensive map resources and advanced navigation tools suitable for serious outdoor enthusiasts. There are no hidden subscription fees, making it a one-time purchase for lifetime access.











