
Freedom: App & Website Blocker
- Rating
- 4.5
- Downloads
- 1,000,000+
- Age
- Everyone
Additional Info
- App Name
- Freedom: App & Website Blocker
- Category
- Productivity
- Package Name
- to.freedom.android2
- Developer
- Eighty Percent Solutions Corporation
- Rating
- 4.5
- Version
- 7.14.1








Analysis by Appcrazy
I installed Freedom: App & Website Blocker expecting a simple way to stop myself opening distracting sites, but I ended up judging it as something broader: a productivity app for designing boundaries around my attention. That distinction matters. A basic timer can tell me to work for a while, while Freedom is aimed at controlling access to apps and websites during the periods when I most need to stay on task.
My first impression was that the app makes sense for a very specific kind of problem: I already know what I should be doing, yet I keep checking the same social feeds, news pages, shopping sites, or entertainment services. The difficulty is not planning a task. It is interrupting the automatic habit of reaching for a familiar distraction. In that situation, putting the distraction behind a deliberate block can be more useful than relying on willpower.
How I decided whether Freedom was right for me
I looked at four practical questions. First, can the app cover the places where I actually lose time? A blocker that handles only one browser is not very helpful if the same distraction is available through another app. Second, can I use it for different kinds of work, rather than creating one rigid rule for every day? Third, does starting a session feel quick enough that I will use it consistently? Finally, is the price reasonable compared with the value of recovering focused time?
Freedom is a free productivity app from Eighty Percent Solutions Corporation, with optional in-app purchases ranging from $12.99 to $199.99 per item. It is rated for Everyone, and the current version I reviewed is 7.14.1, with a minimum operating system requirement of 7.1. Those details make it accessible to a wide range of users, although the purchase structure deserves attention before anyone commits to a paid plan or package.
The app has built a substantial audience: it has passed one million installs, carries an average rating of 4.5 from around eight thousand ratings, and has 818 written reviews. I do not treat those figures as proof that it will suit every workflow, but they do suggest that the basic idea has found a real audience rather than being a niche experiment.
The real decision is about friction, not motivation
When I compare Freedom with the usual alternatives, I separate them into categories. A phone’s built-in screen-time controls are convenient and often good enough for a single-device habit. Browser extensions are lighter and can be excellent for someone whose distractions are almost entirely web-based. Focus timers help structure work periods, but they do not necessarily prevent access to anything. Freedom belongs in the category for people who want a more intentional barrier across the places they use to procrastinate.
That barrier is most valuable when I am vulnerable to a predictable loop. For example, I might open a document to write, remember one unrelated question, search for it, notice a notification, and then spend twenty minutes moving between tabs. In that moment, a timer does not solve the underlying problem. A block that removes the tempting destinations gives me fewer opportunities to negotiate with myself.
Catch Up on the Latest Stories

Microsoft Teams on Mobile Keeps Work Moving, If You Keep It Tidy

Groupon Turns Local Discounts Into a Marketplace, With a Catch

App of the Week: Yandex Go Makes City Errands Easier

Make Xiaomi Weather Work Harder with Smarter Settings and Daily Routines

Boomplay Turns Music Streaming Into a Daily Discovery Habit

Google Docs on Mobile Keeps the Page in Focus, Until Formatting Gets in the Way
There is also a useful psychological difference between deciding not to browse and making browsing unavailable for a chosen period. The first depends on a fresh decision every time temptation appears. The second moves the decision earlier, when I am calm enough to choose a session. That is one of Freedom’s strongest ideas, and it is why I found it more useful for deep work than for vague intentions such as “I should use my phone less.”
Setting up a useful blocking routine
I would not begin by blocking everything. The better approach is to identify the distractions that repeatedly derail one particular activity. For writing, that might mean social networks and news sites. For studying, it could include video platforms, shopping pages, and messaging services that are not needed for the assignment. A short, targeted list is easier to trust than an aggressive setup that unexpectedly interferes with legitimate work.
Freedom becomes more practical when I think in sessions rather than permanent restrictions. I can create a focused period for a clearly defined task, then leave room afterward for communication and browsing. This separation prevents the common mistake of treating every online activity as bad. Research, collaboration, banking, maps, and reference material may all be necessary, so the best block is usually selective rather than absolute.
One non-obvious tip is to prepare the block before the moment of temptation. If I wait until I am already distracted, I am more likely to choose a weak setup or postpone it. Starting a session as part of my work ritual—after opening the document and before beginning the first task—turns Freedom into a cue that work has started, not an emergency repair tool.
Another useful trade-off is to make the first sessions shorter than my ambition suggests. A modest block gives me a chance to discover which sites or apps I genuinely need for work. If I begin with an overly broad session, I may encounter an important service that I forgot to allow, become frustrated, and decide the blocker is unreliable. Gradual refinement makes the system feel like a personal workflow rather than a punishment.
Where Freedom feels stronger than ordinary alternatives
The main advantage I noticed is the app’s focus on controlling both apps and websites instead of treating distraction as only a browser problem. That matters for people who switch between a laptop, phone, and tablet, or who instinctively move from a blocked website to its mobile app. A tool that matches the way I actually consume distractions is more useful than one that looks elegant but covers only one route.
It is also a better fit than a simple countdown timer when my problem is access rather than time awareness. A timer can remind me that a work period is active, but I can still ignore it and open the distracting service. Freedom addresses the more difficult step by placing a boundary around the behavior itself. I still need judgment when choosing what to block, but I do not have to depend entirely on self-control once the session begins.
I found the idea of separate sessions valuable for switching between roles. A morning writing block can use one set of restrictions, while an afternoon study period can use another. That is more realistic than one universal list because my legitimate needs change. A person who needs messaging for work may want it available during office hours but removed during reading time. The decision guide here is simple: the more varied your day, the more important flexible session planning becomes.
A third insight is that the app can be used as a transition tool, not only a concentration tool. I can start a block before commuting, before going to bed, or before beginning household administration. The purpose is not always maximum productivity. Sometimes it is creating a clean gap between one part of the day and the next, so I do not carry an endless stream of online checking into the next activity.
Where another type of tool may fit better
Freedom is not automatically the best option for everyone. If I only need to stop opening one website while working in a particular browser, a browser extension may be quicker and less involved. If my goal is simply to understand how much time I spend on my phone, built-in device controls may provide enough information without adding another workflow.
A focus timer may be preferable for someone who wants encouragement, intervals, or a visible sense of progress rather than firm restrictions. Likewise, people who need to respond instantly to clients, family, or colleagues should be cautious about broad blocks. The inconvenience of missing a necessary message can outweigh the benefit of avoiding a few distractions. In that case, selective blocking is essential, and a lighter tool may be less risky.
I also would not recommend Freedom as a substitute for dealing with a badly designed schedule. If every task is urgent, the block may merely expose the fact that priorities are unclear. The app can protect a work period, but it cannot decide whether the work is important, break a large project into manageable steps, or resolve anxiety about starting. I got better results when I paired a block with one concrete outcome, such as drafting a section or reviewing a defined set of notes.
There is a further limitation in the basic concept: a determined user may still look for another device, another account, or another distraction that was not included in the session. No blocker can replace a sensible environment. I see Freedom as a way to raise the effort required to wander, not as an unbreakable solution to every attention problem. That distinction keeps expectations realistic.
A realistic day-to-day example
Imagine I have a report to finish before lunch. I open the material I need, identify the websites required for research, and block the entertainment and social destinations that usually pull me away. During the session, I keep a small note beside the document for unrelated thoughts. When I remember something I want to search later, I write it down instead of opening a new tab. Once the block ends, I can review that note and decide which items deserve attention.
This workflow reveals a subtle benefit: the blocker can reduce context switching even when I do not feel tempted by a particular site. Every unnecessary lookup has a cost because it changes the mental context of the task. By collecting non-urgent questions for later, I protect the continuity of my work. Freedom handles the access boundary, while the note handles the thoughts that would otherwise push me toward the browser.
For a student, the same method could mean preparing a session around one chapter, blocking entertainment apps and unrelated sites, and leaving only the resources needed for the lesson. For a remote worker, it could protect a meeting-free writing period. For someone trying to reduce evening scrolling, a scheduled block can create a prompt to put the phone aside and start another activity. The app is most effective when the blocked period has a replacement plan.
What the price and switching decision mean
The free entry point makes it possible to understand the workflow before spending money. I would use that opportunity carefully rather than assuming a purchase is necessary on day one. First I would test whether the app covers my main distractions, whether the sessions fit my routine, and whether the restrictions are precise enough for my work. A blocker that I do not trust will not become valuable simply because I paid for it.
The listed in-app purchase range is wide, from $12.99 to $199.99 per item, so the financial decision depends heavily on which option is presented for the intended use. I would check the purchase screen closely, consider how often I expect to use the service, and compare that cost with a simpler browser-based alternative. The right question is not whether a paid plan sounds productive; it is whether the saved attention will justify the commitment for my own habits.
Switching from built-in controls or a browser extension also has a cost beyond money. I need to rebuild my block lists, learn the session routine, and accept a little more planning. That effort is worthwhile when my distractions cross device or app boundaries. It is unnecessary overhead when one narrow restriction already solves the problem. In other words, Freedom earns its place when the problem is broad enough to need a dedicated system.
I would also avoid creating a complicated setup that requires constant maintenance. The best configuration is one I can understand at a glance: a few dependable sessions, carefully chosen blocked destinations, and a clear reason for each list. If I keep adding rules without reviewing whether they help, the app can become another productivity project that consumes the time it was meant to protect.
Who should try it, and who should skip it
I recommend Freedom to people who repeatedly lose focused time to a known group of apps and websites, especially when those distractions appear across more than one kind of device. It is particularly suitable for writers, students, remote workers, and anyone who benefits from a deliberate start and end to a concentration period. The app is also worth considering if ordinary reminders have failed because the problem is easy access rather than lack of awareness.
I would steer casual users toward a simpler alternative when their need is narrow. If one website is the issue, a browser tool may be enough. If the main goal is tracking usage, the operating system’s own controls may be more direct. And if communication must remain constantly available, an overly broad blocking strategy could create more stress than focus.
Before installing, I would answer three questions honestly: Which exact destinations interrupt me? Do I need access to any of them for legitimate work? What will I do during the protected period instead? If I cannot answer the third question, Freedom may block the symptom without making the time useful. If I can answer all three, the app has a much better chance of becoming part of a sustainable routine.
My recommendation after using it
Freedom: App & Website Blocker is a focused choice for people who want to make distraction harder, not merely measure it. I like its strongest idea: moving the decision away from the moment when I am already tempted. The app does not do my planning for me, and it cannot guarantee concentration, but it can remove several easy escape routes when I have chosen a task and need a protected window.
My recommendation is to start with a small, realistic block and test it during one recurring problem period. Keep essential resources available, record unrelated thoughts elsewhere, and adjust the list after the session rather than making it impossibly strict from the beginning. If that routine consistently protects useful work, the app offers a stronger answer than a timer or a single browser extension.
For me, the deciding factor is coverage. If my distractions are spread across websites and apps, Freedom is more compelling than piecing together separate controls. If they are limited to one place, I would choose the simpler option. That makes this a practical decision rather than a universal recommendation: Freedom is most valuable when a clear boundary across several digital escape routes is exactly what your routine is missing.
Pros
- Blocks distracting apps and websites on both mobile and desktop devices.
- Flexible schedules help create focused work
- study
- and rest periods.
- Lock mode makes it harder to bypass an active blocking session.
- Syncs blocking plans across supported devices for consistent control.
- Useful recurring routines reduce the need to manage blocks manually.
Cons
- Some advanced features require a paid subscription.
- Setup can feel complicated when creating detailed blocking rules.
- Certain browser and device limitations may reduce website-blocking coverage.
- Strict sessions can interrupt access to apps needed unexpectedly.
- It may require extra permissions to monitor and restrict device activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Freedom: App & Website Blocker used for?
Freedom is a productivity and focus app designed to block distracting websites and applications across supported devices. After installing it, you can create a blocklist, choose how long the session should last, and start a distraction-free period. It is useful for studying, working, reading, or reducing time spent on social media, news sites, streaming services, and other time-consuming platforms.
Which devices and platforms does Freedom support?
Freedom is built for people who use several devices and want their focus sessions to remain consistent across them. Support can include Android, iPhone, iPad, Mac, Windows, and other compatible platforms, although available features may vary by operating system and subscription plan. Before downloading, check the current store listing and Freedom’s official compatibility information to confirm that your devices are supported.
Can Freedom block both apps and websites?
Yes, Freedom can block selected websites and, on supported platforms, distracting applications as well. You can usually create customized blocklists for different situations, such as work, school, sleep, or personal projects. The exact blocking behavior depends on the device because mobile operating systems impose different restrictions. Some apps or browser content may therefore be handled differently than on a desktop computer.
Can I stop a Freedom session once it has started?
Freedom is designed to make active focus sessions difficult to bypass, which helps prevent impulsive access to blocked content. Depending on the session settings and platform, you may be able to end or modify a session, while stricter options can limit those choices until the scheduled period finishes. It is worth reviewing the session controls carefully before starting, especially when blocking essential communication or work-related services.
Is Freedom free, and does it require a subscription?
Freedom may offer a trial or limited access, but its full set of features generally depends on a paid plan. Premium access can include unlimited sessions, recurring schedules, device synchronization, and additional productivity tools, with pricing varying by platform, region, and billing period. Check the current in-app purchase details before downloading, and remember to review renewal terms if you choose an auto-renewing subscription.











