My Row Counter: Knit & Crochet

Analysis by Appcrazy

I have always found knitting and crochet projects easy to start and surprisingly easy to lose track of. A pattern can be open on one screen, yarn can be waiting beside the sofa, and yet a short interruption is enough to make me wonder whether I finished row 27 or only thought I did. My Row Counter: Knit & Crochet, from Annapurnapp Technologies GmbH, is built around that very ordinary problem. It is a free lifestyle app for Android and iOS that turns row counting into a more organized part of the project rather than something I have to hold in my head.

What makes it more useful than a simple tally counter is the way it brings several parts of a project together: pattern handling, row progress, timing, highlighting, and connections with Ravelry. I would not call it a replacement for every knitting notebook or every pattern platform, but I found it most valuable when a project moved between places and devices in my daily routine. The app has a 4.8 average from around 15 thousand ratings, with more than a million installs, which fits my impression that it has become a familiar tool among people who want more structure without turning their hobby into office work.

From an unfinished project to a workable routine

My starting point with this app was not a complicated technical pattern. It was the more common situation: a project already in progress, a pattern that needed repeated checking, and no reliable memory of the last completed row. That matters because the app is not only useful when beginning a new project. Its real test is whether it can accept an existing project without making me recreate everything from scratch in a frustrating way.

I began by treating the project as a record rather than just a counter. The useful mindset is to enter enough information to recognize the work later, then use the row controls while actually knitting or crocheting. This separation is important. If I try to organize every detail before making a single stitch, the setup feels like a chore. If I create a practical project record first and refine it only when needed, the app gets out of the way much more effectively.

The app’s short store description, “My Row Counter,” sounds modest, but the broader experience is closer to a compact project companion. I can use it for a basic row count, yet the additional tools become more helpful as the pattern becomes longer or the project is interrupted often. For a scarf with a simple repeat, a physical counter may be faster. For a garment, blanket, or detailed lace piece, keeping the count beside the pattern is a much stronger reason to use it.

Setting up the project without overcomplicating it

The first practical choice is deciding how much of the pattern belongs inside the app. Some users will want to import a pattern and work from it directly. Others will prefer to keep a printed pattern or another reading app nearby and use this one only for progress. I think both approaches are valid, and choosing between them early prevents unnecessary duplication.

Advertisements

Pattern import is especially useful when I want the written instructions and the row progress to stay close together. Instead of repeatedly switching between a document and a separate counter, I can work from one project space. The benefit is not just convenience. It reduces the chance that I count rows accurately while following the wrong section of the pattern, a mistake that a basic counter cannot help me catch.

For a project I had already started, I would first identify the current row from the physical work, then set the app to match that point. This is the one moment where the app cannot magically solve uncertainty. If the stitches themselves do not reveal where I stopped, the digital record will only preserve a guess. I recommend taking a moment to inspect the last completed repeat before entering the number, rather than rushing through setup and trusting a questionable count.

Take a Look at Our Blog

The connection with Ravelry adds another route into the workflow for people who already organize patterns there. I see this as a handoff rather than a separate feature: the pattern begins in a place many knitters already use, then becomes part of an active project record. It is convenient when it works with the way I already save patterns, but it also means the app is most appealing to users who want a connected system rather than a standalone clicker.

Counting while both hands are busy

Once the project is ready, the central action is simple: complete a row or round, then update the counter. That sounds obvious, but the important detail is when I do it. I get the most reliable results by making the count part of the physical rhythm of finishing a row, not something I postpone until the end of a television episode or conversation.

The timer helps here because it gives the session a separate record from the row number. I can see how long I have been working without confusing time spent with progress made. That distinction is surprisingly useful on projects where a difficult section takes a long time but advances only a few rows. A timer will not improve my technique, but it can make my expectations more realistic when I return to the project later.

I also found that a counter works best when I decide what it represents. On a flat piece, it may represent completed rows. On a circular project, I may think in rounds. On a pattern with repeated sections, I might need to track the main row while separately remembering a repeat position. The app can organize the count, but I still have to define the counting rule consistently. If I change that rule halfway through, the neat number on screen becomes misleading.

This is one of the app’s less obvious trade-offs. A dedicated physical counter can be faster for a very simple pattern because it asks me to do almost nothing. My Row Counter becomes more valuable when the count needs context: which project it belongs to, where the pattern is, how long the session has lasted, or what section I should read next. The more context I need, the less attractive a bare counter becomes.

Using highlighting to reduce pattern drift

Highlighting is one of the features I appreciate most when a pattern contains long written instructions. My eyes tend to jump ahead, especially when a row includes similar abbreviations or several repeated actions. A highlight can act as a visual bookmark, showing the line I am currently working through rather than forcing me to relocate it after every interruption.

The best way to use it is not to highlight everything. I prefer moving the visual focus only as I complete a row or a meaningful instruction block. If too much of the pattern is marked, the highlight stops being a guide and becomes decoration. Used sparingly, it creates a clear handoff between reading and making: I read the next instruction, work it, update the row, and move the highlight forward.

This workflow is particularly helpful when I leave a project for a day or two. Instead of relying on a loose paper marker that may shift, I have a digital indication of where I intended to continue. It does not replace checking the stitches, especially after a complicated transition, but it gives me a much better starting point than opening a pattern at an arbitrary page.

Managing the handoff between phone, pattern, and physical work

The app’s real-world value appears during handoffs. A project may begin with a pattern saved through Ravelry, continue with an imported document, move to a chair beside the window, and then pause when I put the work into a bag. Each transition creates an opportunity to lose the row, the timer, or the place in the instructions.

I found it useful to finish every session with the same small routine: complete the row if possible, update the count immediately, check the highlighted position, and stop the timer. This takes only a moment, but it creates a clean record for the next session. If I stop in the middle of a row, I would rather make a deliberate note of that state than assume I will remember it. The app helps preserve the organized part of that handoff, while the physical stitches still need to be inspected when I return.

Another handoff happens when I move from the app to a conversation, a recipe, or another activity on my phone. A counter that requires constant attention can become irritating, especially if I am crafting while watching something. My preference is to use the app for deliberate project sessions and avoid treating it as a device that must remain in front of me every second. The tool supports my work best when it records decisions, not when it demands them continuously.

For someone teaching a friend, the project record can also make explanations easier. I can describe the current row and point to the relevant pattern position instead of saying, “I think I am somewhere around here.” That does not turn the app into a teaching platform, but it gives two people a shared reference point when a project is being discussed or handed over.

What the completed workflow gives me

The outcome is not simply a larger number on a screen. The useful result is confidence when I return to the project. I know which project I opened, where I was in the pattern, how the session ended, and what I should do next. That reduces the mental overhead that often makes unfinished craft projects feel more difficult than they really are.

In an everyday scenario, I might work on a sweater after dinner, stop when someone needs my attention, and return to it the following weekend. With a basic counter, I may remember the row but forget whether the count included the last completed round. With this app, the project can retain the counter, the pattern position, the highlight, and the session context. I still verify the physical work, but I am no longer rebuilding the entire memory of the previous evening.

The timer also changes how I evaluate progress. If I have spent a long session on a small section, I can recognize that the project is demanding rather than assume I am working inefficiently. For people who like recording their crafting time, this is a practical extra. For people who find timers distracting, it is easy to ignore and use only the row tools.

I would recommend the app most strongly to anyone who regularly pauses projects, works on several pieces at once, follows downloaded or imported patterns, or loses track when rows look similar. It is also a good fit for knitters and crocheters who want a digital record but do not want to maintain a separate spreadsheet or notebook. The free starting point makes it easy to try before deciding whether the additional options fit a particular routine.

The age rating is Everyone, which matches the app’s straightforward craft purpose. It is free to install, while optional in-app purchases range from under a dollar to about fifteen dollars per item. That pricing detail matters because the basic idea is easy to understand without paying, but users should consider whether the features they actually need are included in their preferred workflow before spending money on extras.

Where the flow breaks down

The app is not the right choice for every maker. If I am working on a very simple project with a short repeat, a physical clicker may be quicker and more comfortable. A phone can introduce its own friction: it needs to be nearby, the screen may not be ideal in every crafting position, and interacting with it can interrupt the tactile rhythm that makes knitting or crochet relaxing.

There is also a learning curve caused by having several tools in one place. Pattern import, highlighting, timing, Ravelry-related organization, and counting are useful together, but they create more decisions than a single-purpose counter. Someone who only wants to tap once per row may feel that the app is larger than the problem they are trying to solve.

Digital organization can also create false confidence. A saved row number does not prove that the stitches are correct, and a highlighted line does not guarantee that I followed every instruction. I still need to look at increases, decreases, repeats, and shaping. The app records my process; it does not act as a knitting or crochet instructor and cannot inspect the physical fabric for mistakes.

Pattern handling may be less satisfying for people who strongly prefer paper. I like having instructions and progress close together, but some makers read printed patterns faster, annotate margins freely, or keep their phone away from yarn. In that case, the best use may be a narrow one: keep the paper pattern and use the app only as a project-specific counter and timer.

There is another practical limitation in shared or changing workspaces. If I move between a phone, a printed pattern, and a project bag without following a consistent closing routine, the app cannot prevent mismatched information. The strongest results depend on disciplined handoffs. That is not a flaw unique to this app, but it is important because the app’s promise is organization; careless updates can make an organized interface preserve the wrong state.

Who should choose it over simpler alternatives?

I would choose this app over a normal counter when the project has enough moving parts that context matters. A garment with shaping, a blanket with repeated sections, or a pattern I revisit after long gaps can benefit from having the count, instructions, visual position, and timing connected. The same is true when I work on several projects and need to open the correct record rather than remember which number belongs to which piece.

I would choose a notebook when I want flexible sketches, measurements, yarn notes, or free-form observations that do not fit neatly into a digital project flow. I would choose a paper pattern when screen reading is uncomfortable or when marking up the page is central to how I work. I would choose a basic counter when speed and simplicity matter more than history. My Row Counter sits between these options: more structured than paper notes, broader than a clicker, and less open-ended than a general notebook.

That middle position is its strength and its weakness. It offers a useful workflow for people who want their pattern and progress to travel together, but it asks them to adopt a small system. I do not think that is excessive, especially for long projects, yet I would not recommend building a complicated digital routine for a one-hour beginner swatch unless the person already enjoys tracking details.

After using it as a companion to actual crafting rather than as a standalone counter, I came away with a clear opinion. The app is most successful when it handles the boring transitions: stopping, returning, locating the right instruction, and remembering which project owns the current count. Those are the moments when handmade work is most vulnerable to small errors.

My final recommendation is simple: use My Row Counter when your projects need memory, not merely counting. It is free, approachable, and broad enough to support a serious workflow while remaining useful for casual sessions. I would begin with one active project, import or connect the pattern only if that genuinely saves switching, and establish a consistent end-of-session routine. If that routine feels helpful after a few projects, the app earns its place beside the yarn. If it feels like more administration than crafting, a physical counter or notebook will probably serve you better.