Simply Draw: Learn to Draw

Analysis by Appcrazy

I approached Simply Draw: Learn to Draw as someone who enjoys sketching but does not always know what to practise next. The app sits in the education category and focuses on guided drawing lessons rather than acting like a full digital art studio. That distinction matters: it is designed to help you follow a learning path, not replace a professional illustration tool.

After spending time with it, my overall impression is that Simply Draw is most useful when you want structure. Opening a blank page can be surprisingly intimidating, especially when you are trying to improve from occasional doodles to more deliberate drawing. A lesson-based approach gives you a starting point, a subject to focus on, and a reason to keep practising. I found that more approachable than searching randomly for drawing videos and hoping the next one matched my level.

Simply Ltd presents the app as a free education app for everyone, with optional purchases ranging from around fifteen dollars to around ninety dollars per item. The current version is 1.5.0, and it requires operating system version 11 or later. That combination makes it easy to try for many users, while the paid options mean you should understand the learning model before deciding whether to spend money.

How Simply Draw feels in everyday use

The central experience is straightforward: choose a lesson, follow the drawing process step by step, and use repetition to build confidence. I like this format because it removes one of the biggest obstacles beginners face: deciding what to draw and how to break it down. Instead of treating a finished picture as something that appears through talent, the lesson format encourages you to think in stages.

That staged approach is especially helpful when you are drawing after work or during a short break. Imagine having twenty minutes before dinner and wanting to do something creative without setting up a complicated workspace. Simply Draw gives that time a clear purpose. You can work through part of a lesson, stop, and return later rather than spending the whole session looking for suitable material.

The app is also a better fit for people who learn by watching and copying than for people who prefer long explanations about artistic theory. Its appeal comes from visible progress. You can concentrate on the current action instead of worrying about perspective, proportion, or shading all at once. For a beginner, limiting the problem to one step can make practice feel manageable.

Advertisements

I would not describe it as a replacement for paper, pencils, or a dedicated drawing application. Its value is in instruction. If you already have strong fundamentals and want advanced control over brushes, layers, masks, or detailed editing, you will probably need another tool alongside it. Simply Draw is about learning to draw, not producing polished digital artwork inside one comprehensive workspace.

A useful starting point for complete beginners

The strongest audience is someone who has repeatedly said, “I cannot draw,” but has not followed a consistent practice routine. The app gives that person a less intimidating entry point. You do not need to invent exercises or decide whether a particular online tutorial is too difficult. The guided format encourages you to begin with the next visible action.

Take a Look at Our Blog

Parents may also find the Everyone content rating reassuring when choosing an educational creative app for a household device. That does not automatically make it ideal for every child, since attention span and reading ability still matter, but the broad age suitability makes it easier to consider for family use.

Older learners can benefit for a different reason. Adults often have enough motivation to learn but very little patience for complicated setup. A short guided lesson can fit more naturally into a daily routine than a large course that requires a dedicated desk, a collection of supplies, and a long uninterrupted session.

My practical advice is to treat each lesson as a practice session rather than a test. Do not rush to make your result look identical to the example. Pay attention to the order of the marks, the relative size of shapes, and where you tend to lose control. That mindset turns the app from a copying exercise into a way to notice your habits.

Where it sits beside familiar alternatives

The usual alternatives are free video tutorials, illustrated books, social media lessons, and open-ended drawing apps. Each option has a different strength. Videos can offer more personality and explanation, books are easy to revisit, and drawing apps provide freedom. Simply Draw’s advantage is the combination of a focused lesson and a clear learning purpose.

Compared with a random video search, the app should reduce decision fatigue. You do not have to judge several thumbnails, skip introductions, or wonder whether the creator is teaching at your level. That convenience is valuable for a beginner, although a video may still be better when you need a detailed explanation of why a technique works.

Compared with a blank canvas, the guided approach is less flexible but more welcoming. A blank canvas is excellent once you know what you want to practise. At the beginning, however, it can encourage aimless doodling or make every imperfect line feel like failure. Simply Draw trades freedom for direction, and I think that is a sensible trade for its intended audience.

Compared with a traditional book, the app is easier to use when you want an active, repeatable routine. A book can be more comfortable for long study sessions and may offer broader reference material, but a mobile lesson is easier to carry into a spare moment. If you prefer learning away from screens, a book remains the better choice.

What the current release tells me about the product

Version 1.5.0 suggests that the app is still in a relatively early stage of its product life, especially considering its release on October 30, 2025. I would avoid reading that as a promise of a particular roadmap, but it does shape how I judge the experience. At this point, I look for a clear core routine and a stable reason to return rather than expecting the breadth of a mature professional art platform.

The current evidence points to a product centred on guided learning. That is important because many creative apps try to do too much: they combine lessons, communities, editing tools, challenges, and marketplaces until the basic learning path becomes difficult to find. Simply Draw benefits from keeping its identity narrow. When I open it with the intention of practising, the concept makes sense immediately.

There is also a difference between having many lessons and having a genuinely progressive curriculum. A store summary can tell you that lessons are step by step, but the real question for a learner is whether those steps build useful habits over time. I would judge the app by how well it helps you move from copying individual examples to understanding shapes, spacing, and construction. That is the point at which a beginner starts becoming independent.

The app’s average rating is 4.8 from around twenty-nine thousand ratings, with roughly one thousand two hundred written reviews. Those figures show strong user approval, but I would still interpret them carefully. A high rating can confirm that many people enjoy the experience; it does not guarantee that the teaching style will suit someone seeking advanced instruction or a completely offline, paper-first routine.

How existing users may experience the current version

If you already use Simply Draw, the current version is best understood as a continuation of the guided-learning idea rather than a reason to abandon your existing routine. Users who enjoy short, directed practice should feel at home. The most important benefit is consistency: returning to a familiar lesson format makes it easier to build a habit than switching between unrelated tutorials.

New users should begin slowly instead of trying to finish everything immediately. I recommend repeating a difficult exercise with a different goal each time. On the first attempt, focus on following the sequence. On the second, watch your proportions. On the third, compare the pressure and confidence of your lines. This creates more value from the same material and helps you identify what actually needs improvement.

One less obvious advantage of a structured app is that it can expose impatience. I noticed that it is tempting to jump ahead mentally, especially when a simple shape seems obvious. Yet the early steps often establish the alignment that makes later details work. Skipping mentally is not the same as understanding. Staying with the sequence can reveal why a drawing feels unbalanced even when the individual marks look reasonable.

Another useful workflow is to keep a small record outside the app. You could photograph your practice pages or save a brief note about what felt difficult after each session. The app supplies direction, but your own record supplies reflection. Over time, that combination makes progress easier to see because improvement in drawing is often gradual rather than dramatic from one lesson to the next.

The main limitations to consider before paying

The first limitation is the difference between being free to install and being completely free to use. Optional purchases can cost from around fifteen dollars to around ninety dollars per item, so I would not assume that every part of the learning experience is available without payment. Before buying, I would spend enough time with the accessible material to decide whether the teaching style suits you.

The pricing range also makes the purchase decision more personal than a simple yes-or-no recommendation. Someone who uses the app several times a week may see value in a larger learning commitment. Someone who only wants occasional drawing prompts may prefer to stay with the free portion or choose individual lessons elsewhere. The right choice depends on whether Simply Draw becomes part of your routine.

A second limitation is that step-by-step guidance can become restrictive. Beginners benefit from boundaries, but experienced artists may find the process too prescriptive. If your goal is to develop a distinctive visual style, experiment with unusual compositions, or work from your own references, you will eventually need to leave the guided path and practise independently.

A third limitation is the risk of mistaking completion for mastery. Finishing a lesson can feel satisfying, but reproducing an example once does not prove that you understand the underlying construction. I recommend testing yourself afterward by drawing the same subject from memory or changing its position and proportions. If you cannot adapt it, return to the lesson with a focus on principles rather than surface details.

The operating system requirement is another practical consideration. Devices running an older system below version 11 will not meet the stated minimum, so anyone using an older phone or tablet should check compatibility before planning a routine around the app. This is a small detail, but it can be frustrating to discover only after deciding that the app is the right learning option.

Who should use it, and who should choose something else

I would recommend Simply Draw to a beginner who wants a calm, guided route into drawing, particularly someone who loses momentum when faced with too many choices. It is also a good match for casual learners who want a creative habit that fits into short sessions. The free entry point makes it reasonable to test the experience before considering any optional purchase.

I would be more cautious about recommending it to an advanced illustrator, an art student looking for formal anatomy or perspective study, or a user who expects a complete digital painting environment. Those people may be better served by specialist courses, reference libraries, or professional drawing software. Simply Draw can still provide warm-up practice, but it should not be their only educational resource.

It may also be the wrong choice if you strongly prefer unstructured exploration. Some learners improve fastest by drawing from life, filling sketchbooks, and correcting their own work. For them, the app’s guided sequence could feel like a constraint rather than support. In that situation, a blank canvas or physical sketchbook may encourage more meaningful experimentation.

For a child, I would make the decision based on supervision and learning style rather than the Everyone label alone. A child who enjoys following instructions may find the lessons motivating. Another child may become frustrated if the expected result feels too important. Keeping the emphasis on trying, observing, and making another attempt will matter more than producing a perfect copy.

What I would watch as the app develops

As Simply Ltd continues developing the product, I would watch how well the lesson path supports progression. The key question is whether learners can move from guided copying toward independent drawing. More content would be welcome, but thoughtful sequencing would matter more than a large collection of disconnected subjects.

I would also pay attention to how clearly the app explains the purpose behind each step. A beginner can follow instructions without understanding them, and that creates a ceiling. The most valuable future direction would be teaching users how to transfer a method to a new subject, not simply giving them another finished example to reproduce.

Another area worth watching is the balance between free access and paid learning. Optional purchases are reasonable for a specialised educational product, but users need a clear sense of what they are getting before committing to a higher-priced item. A transparent progression from introductory practice to deeper instruction would make the decision easier and reduce the feeling of guessing.

I would not expect the app to become a full art studio, and I hope it does not lose its approachable identity by trying to compete with every drawing tool. Its strongest direction is probably deeper teaching: better explanations, smarter progression, and exercises that encourage users to apply what they have learned in their own way.

My final assessment after using it

Simply Draw works because it addresses a real beginner problem: wanting to learn but not knowing how to organise practice. The step-by-step format gives drawing a manageable shape, and that can be more valuable than a huge library of disconnected tips. I found it most convincing when I treated it as a regular practice companion rather than a magic shortcut.

Its weaknesses are equally clear. The guided method will not satisfy everyone, paid items require careful consideration, and completing lessons is not the same as developing independent skill. Users who want advanced theory, expressive experimentation, or professional digital tools should look beyond this app or combine it with other resources.

Still, for someone who wants an accessible education app and a clear way to begin, I think it is worth trying. With over five hundred thousand installs, a 4.8 average, and a free starting point, it has attracted substantial interest while remaining easy to sample. My recommendation is to use the early lessons as a test of fit, practise slowly, and only consider an optional purchase once the routine genuinely helps you draw more often.

My honest takeaway: Simply Draw is best when you need direction, encouragement, and a practical reason to pick up a pencil or stylus today. It will not replace patient practice, but it can make that practice easier to start and easier to repeat.