Infinite Lives

Analysis by Appcrazy

I approached Infinite Lives as the kind of mobile adventure game that asks for curiosity rather than a fixed route. Its central appeal is the chance to watch superhumans and subhumans struggle for control, then see how your own choices affect the shape of that conflict. That premise gives it a more open-ended personality than a conventional level-by-level adventure, although it also means the experience can feel less tidy and immediately guided.

Developed by MDickie, the game is free to download and sits in the mature end of mobile gaming, with a 17+ content rating. It has already passed 500 thousand installs and holds a 4.1 average from around 6 thousand ratings, which suggests that its unusual style has found a substantial audience. I would not mistake those figures for a guarantee that everyone will enjoy it, though. This is a game for players willing to experiment with a strange world and accept some friction while learning how it works.

How the open-ended adventure feels in practice

The most important thing to understand is that Infinite Lives is built around possibility rather than a single carefully staged storyline. The conflict between superhumans and subhumans gives the world a broad dramatic direction, but the attraction is in exploring what can happen inside that setup. I found myself paying attention not just to immediate objectives, but also to the wider balance of power and the way different characters fit into it.

That makes the game feel closer to a playable situation than a traditional adventure with a clearly marked beginning, middle, and end. In many mobile games, the safest approach is to follow the highlighted task, collect the reward, and move to the next screen. Here, that mindset can make the experience feel narrower than it really is. The better approach is to treat each session as an experiment: try a different action, observe the result, and remember what created an advantage or caused trouble.

For me, that freedom is the strongest reason to give the game time. The same broad conflict can remain interesting when I am not simply repeating a memorized solution. It also makes short sessions useful. If I only have a few minutes, I can enter with a small goal, such as testing a new approach or seeing how a situation develops, instead of needing to complete a long mission before the session feels worthwhile.

A game that rewards observation more than rushing

My first practical tip is to resist the urge to act immediately whenever the game presents a new situation. Open-ended systems often hide their most useful information in what happens before a player commits to a plan. Watching who is involved, what kind of pressure is building, and which side appears to have momentum can prevent a careless decision.

Advertisements

A second useful habit is to treat failed attempts as reconnaissance rather than wasted time. When a plan goes badly, I try to identify the exact assumption that failed. Did I misread the situation, choose the wrong moment, or expect a character to behave differently? That way, a setback gives me a better model of the game instead of simply encouraging me to repeat the same action faster.

This is also where the game can divide players. Someone who wants a polished, strongly directed adventure may see the open structure as confusing. Someone who enjoys testing possibilities may find that uncertainty is the point. Infinite Lives does not seem designed to remove every awkward moment for the player; it expects some personal interpretation.

Take a Look at Our Blog

Why the superhuman and subhuman conflict matters

The setting is not just decoration. The contrast between superhumans and subhumans gives the adventure its identity and creates a natural question behind many encounters: who is actually in control? I enjoyed thinking about the conflict in terms of influence rather than only immediate victory. A powerful character may not automatically make every situation easy, and a weaker position can still become interesting if it opens a different route through the world.

That perspective helps the game stand apart from ordinary action adventures. In a typical alternative, the player is clearly the hero, enemies are clearly marked, and progress mostly means becoming stronger. Here, the broader struggle makes the player consider position, allegiance, and consequences. Even when the underlying interaction is simple, the framing gives it more room for personal interpretation.

There is a trade-off, however. A flexible conflict is harder to communicate than a straightforward mission chain. Players who depend on constant instructions may spend time wondering what matters most. I recommend giving the game a patient first session rather than judging it after a few rushed minutes. The unusual appeal becomes clearer once you stop expecting it to behave like a standard mobile campaign.

Cost, value, and the practical trade-offs

The basic entry point is straightforward: Infinite Lives is free, so there is no purchase required to discover whether its open-ended adventure suits you. The game also lists in-app purchases at $3.99 per item. That distinction matters. Free access lowers the risk of trying it, while optional spending should be judged by how much extra convenience or enjoyment it provides to an individual player, not by the fact that it exists.

I would approach the purchase question slowly. Play enough to understand the core rhythm first, then decide whether an item solves a problem you genuinely have or merely encourages an impulse purchase. Because the game’s main attraction is experimentation, spending money should not be treated as a substitute for learning its systems. If the basic experience does not hold your attention, an added item is unlikely to change that fundamental reaction.

From a value perspective, the free starting point is the clearest advantage. You can test the tone, the unusual conflict, and the amount of freedom without committing to a paid game. The more complicated question is whether the optional items feel worthwhile for your personal style. I would not assume they are necessary, and I would avoid promising that they transform the experience. Their value depends on what you want from the game and how often you expect to return.

That makes Infinite Lives easier to recommend as a trial than as an automatic purchase. A player who enjoys the core loop can decide later whether spending is justified. A player who prefers a complete premium experience with every major element clearly included from the start may feel more comfortable with a paid adventure that has a more transparent structure.

Where the game creates real value

The most convincing value comes from replayable thought rather than a single dramatic finish. I can revisit the same general world with a different attitude: cautious one time, aggressive another, or focused on understanding the conflict instead of forcing a quick result. That kind of value is personal, but it is meaningful because it can extend the life of a game without requiring a new story every few minutes.

It is especially useful for players who like to discuss possibilities with friends. After a session, there is more to talk about than whether a level was completed. You can compare decisions, describe unexpected developments, and debate whether a different approach would have shifted control. That conversational quality is a genuine strength, even though it may not appeal to someone who wants a purely private, tightly scripted experience.

Another benefit is that the game can fit different levels of attention. I would use it during a short break when I want an interactive distraction, but I would also return when I have more time to explore. The important point is not to measure every session by conventional progress. Sometimes the useful outcome is discovering a possibility, learning a pattern, or finding out that a previously attractive plan is unreliable.

Friction that prospective players should expect

The same freedom that gives the game personality can make it feel rough around the edges. I sometimes prefer clear priorities, especially when I am playing on a small screen or only have a limited amount of time. If you need every objective explained in a precise order, the open-ended design may test your patience.

There is also a mental cost to experimentation. The game asks me to remember what I tried and to form my own conclusions. That is rewarding when I am in the mood for discovery, but it can feel like work after a tiring day. A more conventional adventure may be the better choice when I want a relaxed, guided sequence with minimal interpretation.

The mature rating is another practical consideration. This is not a game I would recommend casually for children or for shared family play without first considering whether its themes and presentation are appropriate. The 17+ classification should be treated as part of the buying decision, not as a minor label hidden in the store details.

Device compatibility is also worth checking before installing. The listed minimum operating-system requirement is Android 7.1, so users on older software should not assume the game will be suitable. On a compatible device, I would still keep expectations realistic: an open-ended game can feel demanding in terms of attention even when starting it is technically simple.

Three ways I would get more from it

1. I would begin with a low-risk observation session. Instead of trying to dominate the conflict immediately, I would watch how the situation is arranged and note which actions seem to create lasting changes. This gives the first serious attempt a purpose and reduces random button pressing.

2. I would keep a simple mental record of decisions that produced surprising results. The game’s value grows when discoveries influence later play, so remembering one useful lesson is more valuable than chasing several unconnected actions.

3. I would separate experimentation from progress. On one session, I might test a strange idea purely to learn what happens; on another, I might use that knowledge to pursue a more deliberate objective. Mixing those two moods can make a failed experiment feel more frustrating than it needs to be.

These habits are not about turning the game into a rigid checklist. They are ways to make its freedom easier to enjoy. The less I demanded a perfect result from every attempt, the more I noticed the distinctive situations the game was trying to create.

Who should install it, and who should skip it

I think Infinite Lives is a good fit for players who enjoy adventure games with unusual premises, shifting power, and room to make their own stories. It is also suitable for people who like replaying a scenario to see how a different decision changes the mood or direction. The free entry point makes it particularly easy for curious players to test that style without paying first.

I would recommend it to a friend who says, “I want a mobile game that gives me something to figure out.” I would be more cautious with someone who says, “I want a polished campaign that tells me exactly what to do.” That second player may get more satisfaction from a conventional adventure with explicit chapters, predictable progression, and a clearly defined protagonist.

Players who dislike mature themes should skip it, regardless of the free price. I would also avoid recommending it to anyone looking for a competitive online experience, a relaxing puzzle game, or a purely cinematic story. Its appeal comes from the particular conflict between superhumans and subhumans and from the freedom to explore that situation, not from fitting every popular mobile genre at once.

A realistic everyday use case would be a short evening break after work. I might play for ten minutes with one question in mind, such as whether a cautious approach can change the balance of a situation. If the result is interesting, I can continue; if not, I can stop without having lost money on an expensive session. That flexibility is one of the strongest practical reasons to try it.

How it compares with more familiar adventure games

Compared with a standard mobile adventure, Infinite Lives feels less like a guided tour and more like a sandbox built around conflict. The usual alternative is easier to understand immediately: follow the plot, complete the objective, unlock the next piece, and repeat. That structure is often better for players who value clarity and emotional pacing.

Infinite Lives has a different advantage. It leaves more room for the player to decide what counts as an interesting outcome. The story is not only something I consume; it is also something I interpret through my actions. That can produce more memorable personal moments than a routine mission, but it can also produce less consistency from one session to another.

In short, I would choose this game over a conventional adventure when I want unpredictability and experimentation. I would choose the conventional option when I want a calm, directed narrative or a reliable sense of forward progress. Neither approach is automatically superior. The right choice depends on whether I want to discover the game’s possibilities or simply enjoy the route the developer has already prepared.

My final recommendation

Infinite Lives is worth trying because its free entry point gives curious players a low-risk way to experience an unusually open adventure. MDickie has built its identity around the struggle between superhumans and subhumans, and that premise works best when I treat the game as a place for experiments rather than a checklist of missions.

I would not call it a universal recommendation. The mature rating, the optional $3.99 purchases, and the less directed structure all deserve attention before you commit your time or money. Players who want constant guidance may be happier elsewhere, while players who enjoy discovering unexpected outcomes can find much more here than the short store summary suggests.

With version 1.0.7 installed on a compatible device, my advice is simple: start free, take time to observe, and postpone any purchase until you know exactly what you want from the experience. If the idea of watching a power struggle develop through your own choices sounds more appealing than following a fixed adventure path, this is a game I would comfortably recommend trying. If you need a neatly scripted journey, I would skip it and choose a more traditional alternative instead.